SynthesisBMJ open gastroenterology2025
Interventions for maintenance of surgically induced remission in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions for maintenance of surgically induced remission in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Management Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesApproximately 50% of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) undergo surgery, and a significant proportion suffer from a post-surgical recurrence. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of various interventions.
designSystematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to February 2025. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), reported in any language, comparing treatments used for maintaining surgically induced remission in CD were included. The primary outcomes were clinical relapse, endoscopic relapse and withdrawal due to adverse events. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Certainty of evidence was rated with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation), and SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) was used to rank treatments.
resultsThere were 34 RCTs (n=3197). For clinical relapse, adalimumab reduced the risk of relapse compared with placebo (moderate certainty), risk ratio (RR) 0.31 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.60), moderate effect size. Two treatments may reduce the risk of clinical relapse (low certainty): 5-aminosalicylic acid (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.94; trivial effect size) and purine analogues (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.96; trivial effect size). All other treatments were of very low certainty. For endoscopic relapse, vedolizumab probably reduced the risk of relapse (moderate certainty), RR 0.37 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.80), large effect size. Adalimumab may reduce the risk of endoscopic relapse (low certainty), RR 0.47 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.80), large effect size. All other treatments were of very low certainty.
conclusionsAdalimumab and vedolizumab reduce endoscopic relapse with moderate to large effects supported by moderate to low certainty evidence. Adalimumab also prevents clinical relapse with moderate certainty. Other therapies either had evidence of trivial effect size or very low certainty evidence. Postoperative maintenance should be individualised based on patient risk and treatment profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.