ArticleJournal of sport and health science2025
Mitigating climate change in sports leagues: A scenario-based analysis of travel distances in women's and men's amateur soccer in Germany.
Article in Journal of sport and health science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTravel to away games is a major but under-studied source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in grassroots sport. We quantified these emissions and tested scheduling solutions that could make amateur soccer "climate-smart".
methodsMatch schedules for the 2022/23 season of 384 amateur women's and men's teams (35 groups from the 6 lowest leagues) in 3 German regions were geocoded. Baseline round-trip driving distances were calculated then converted to GHG equivalents (217 kg/100 km). Two optimization scenarios were modeled: (A) reallocating teams to geographically compact groups; (B) placing all teams in one league with an unbalanced schedule favoring nearby opponents. To generate near-optimal solutions, we used mixed-integer programming and custom heuristics.
resultsCurrent scheduling required 156,558 km of travel (106.5-159.7 tons of GHG). Scenario A cut distance to 117,428 km (-25%), Scenario B to 101,333 km (-35%). League-level savings ranged from 2% to 57% (A) and 21% to 62% (B); the urban men's league achieved the largest absolute reduction (-20,853 km, -62%). In total, switching to Scenario B would save 37.5 to 56.4 tons of GHG compared to the current scheduling without reducing the number of matches.
conclusionSimple, data-driven changes to group composition or match scheduling can substantially shrink the carbon footprint of grassroots soccer while maintaining competitive integrity. Sports federations can adopt such optimization tools to align league operations with planetary-health goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.