ArticleAnnals of vascular surgery2026
Three-Dimensional Assessment of Renal Artery Aneurysm Growth Using Vascular Deformation Mapping.
Article in Annals of vascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRisk factors for renal artery aneurysm (RAA) growth are poorly understood. Vascular deformation mapping (VDM) is known to accurately depict 3-dimensional (3D) growth patterns of aortic aneurysms. This study investigates the feasibility of VDM to accurately define 3D growth of RAAs and the relationship of RAA diameter alone to 3D growth.
methodsFifty-five RAAs having ≥2 computed tomography angiograms with ≤2.5 mm slice thickness, ≥2 months apart, were studied. RAAs were segmented and their volumes (including calcium, thrombus, lumen, and total) were determined. Change in RAA diameter (ΔDiameter) and volume (ΔVolume) over time were calculated. VDM was used to quantify 3D growth. ΔVolume and mean 3D growth were compared between RAAs having stable diameters and those with increased diameters (≥0.1 cm ΔDiameter) and the relationship between ΔDiameter, ΔVolume, and 3D growth was examined.
resultsTwenty-five of the 55 RAAs studied had successful VDM analyses. The affected patients' mean age was 60.1 ± 8.7 years and 56% were female. One RAA was symptomatic, with no ruptures. The overall ΔDiameter was 0.86 ± 1.25 mm/year (mean CT interval of 43.1 months). Nine (36.0%) RAAs exhibited diameter increases, and when compared to the 16 stable RAAs, there were no differences in ΔVolume or 3D growth. There was no correlation of ΔDiameter with 3D growth or ΔVolume (r < 0.4, P > 0.05). RAA 3D growth strongly correlated with ΔTotal Volume (r = 0.653, P < 0.001) and ΔLumen Volume (r = 0.695, P < 0.001).
conclusionVDM is an accurate method for assessing RAA growth, yields additional metrics not provided by diameter alone, and provides a more comprehensive assessment of RAA morphology changes that correlate with ΔVolume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.