ReviewInternational dental journal2026
Contemporary Applications of Robotic Systems in Dental Implantology: A Review.
Review in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Algorithms: Embodied Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Dentistry.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Implant Dentistry: Clinical Validity, Diagnostic Performance, Surgical Planning, and Medico-Legal Implications-A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Robot-Assisted Dentistry: What the Evidence Supports and Which Outcomes Are Still Missing.Cureus · 2026Review
- A six-level clinical autonomy framework for artificial intelligence in dentistry.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of robotics into dental implantology represents a transformative shift towards enhanced surgical precision, consistency, and reproducibility. This review critically examines the development and clinical application of current dental implant robotic systems through th`e lens of robotic autonomy levels, as classified by contemporary frameworks. Emphasis is placed on systems operating at autonomy levels 0-1, (collaborative), and level 2, (task-autonomous), highlighting their procedural capabilities, limitations, and regulatory considerations. Although robotic systems demonstrate superior accuracy compared to either dynamic of static guided implant placement, several challenges persist, including high costs, complexity, clinical validation, scalability and constraints in performing biologically complex procedures. Previously cited barriers, such as restricted access to the posterior oral regions, are being increasingly addressed through flexible hardware and improved intraoral registration protocols. To support continued advancement, this review proposes strategic initiatives aimed at transitioning toward conditional autonomy (Level 3). These include simplification of surgical workflows, enhanced procedural flexibility, integration of AI-driven intraoperative adaptation, and modular system design. By focusing on robotic autonomy rather than general system overviews, this article offers a forward-looking perspective on how the next generation of dental surgical robots may achieve greater independence while maintaining safety, precision and clinical control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.