ArticleSalud colectiva2025
[Intersubjectivity and modes of care in health: eco-ethno-social sensitivity and critical technological competence for quality-equity in digital health].
Article in Salud colectiva, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this essay, we propose that Mendes Gonçalves' theory of the labor process in health can contribute to a critical theory of digital health capable of deconstructing technological alienation within digital transformation processes in the health sector. First, we identify modes of care and models of technological organization of healthcare delivery. Second, we analyze the collective-informational mode of care oriented toward sociotechnical health networks, highlighting collaborative practices rooted in territories and local realities. Third, we propose a theoretical platform for understanding digital transformation in health, based on the articulation of the following concepts: sociotechnical appropriation, metapresence, critical technological competence, quality-equity, and eco-ethno-social sensitivity. Finally, we outline the epistemological and theoretical foundations necessary for a "digital epistemodiversity," understood as an ecology of knowledges in which technical objects, sociotechnical systems, human agents, and transhuman beings may coexist, interact, and produce systemic changes in the health field, with the protagonism of healthcare workers and broad popular participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.