Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41422524›Full record

ArticleNursing open2025

Adherence to Guidance About Complementary Feeding and Vitamin D Supplementation in Infants: The Role of Information Sources.

Suzannah Helps, Gillian Mancz, Taraneh Dean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suzannah HelpsSchool of Dental, Health and Care Professions, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8033-1752
Gillian ManczSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Taraneh DeanLondon South Bank University, London, UK.

Funding

University of Portsmouth
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify the characteristics of parents with poor adherence to guidelines around introduction of solid foods and supplementation with Vitamin D, and to assess the role of different sources of information in adherence to these guidelines.

designA cross-sectional survey which was part of a birth cohort study following pregnant mothers and their infants in a UK city.

methods390 parents who had consented to take part in a birth cohort study were sent a postal questionnaire when their infant was around 6 months old. 220 parents completed this questionnaire about their infants' diet and the sources of information they had used to make decisions about introducing complementary foods to their infant.

resultsAround half (54%) of parents adhered to current guidelines to delay the introduction of solid foods until after their infants were 24 weeks, and adherence to guidelines was positively associated with maternal age and education level as well as with the use of formal information sources such as a Health Visitor or leaflets. Vitamin D supplementation rates of infants by exclusively breastfeeding mothers were low (35%) but increased over time. The internet was a particularly significant source of information used by parents to make feeding decisions for their infants.

conclusionIn this sample, adherence to guidance around the introduction of solid foods and Vitamin D supplementation was low. Health professionals must develop strategies to communicate these guidelines more effectively. PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Members of a PPI group were involved in the study design and development of study materials, including marketing materials.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsGuideline AdherenceInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaParentsVitamin DAdultBreast FeedingCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInformation SourcesMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID41422524
PMCPMC12718621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.