Observational studyNursing open2025
Deriving Insights From an Occupational Incident Reporting System to Enhance Understanding of Musculoskeletal Incidents Among Nurses and Midwives.
Observational study in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo describe nurse, midwife and injury characteristics of musculoskeletal incident workplace compensation claims (WorkSafe) in Victoria, Australia; to determine the ratio between lost work for musculoskeletal compensation claimants, compared to hours worked by the Victorian nursing and midwifery workforce; to modify a risk-identification framework for workplace incidents involving staff-assisted patient movement reported in the Victorian Health Incident Management System (VHIMS), specific to incidents that occur during staff-assisted patient movement, and apply the coding framework to VHIMS incidents to report the risk factors associated with these incidents. DESIGN AND
methodsObservational data collected prospectively between July 2017 and December 2021 via WorkSafe, and via VHIMS from two Victorian health services, were extracted. A 7-item risk-identification coding framework was modified over three iterations and tested to describe VHIMS workplace incidents that occurred during staff-assisted patient movement and resulted in staff musculoskeletal incidents, or a patient fall.
resultsOf 1936 Victorian nursing workforce compensation scheme claims audited (mean claimant age 43 years (SD 13), 90% female and 4% midwives), the mean incapacity was 152 days (SD 199), resulting in 5700 h of lost work, at a cost of $AUD14,325,109, per year. For every 206 h worked by this workforce, there was 1 h lost due to a musculoskeletal incident compensation claim. Of the 748 health service VHIMS staff incidents, most involved the trunk (60%), and risk factors included patient participation or behaviour (72%) and load (65%). Of the 1935 health service VHIMS patient falls, most occurred during transfers (39%) or walking (30%), and risk factors included patient participation or behaviour (94%) and load (55%).
conclusionNursing and midwife musculoskeletal incidents carry significant individual and workforce costs. Risk factors were identified with the modified risk-identification framework, which could be used to support clinical teams in developing data-driven solutions to prevent staff incidents and patient falls. REPORTING
methodStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) extension for cross-sectional studies. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution. TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: As this study used an observational design, trial registration was not required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.