ArticleMicrobial ecology2025
Assessing the Value of Testate Amoebae and their Functional Traits in Detecting Climate Change-Induced Peatland Drying.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change-induced drying is projected for northern peatlands, but evidence on its extent is inconsistent. Testate amoebae (TA) are a water table depth proxy that also responds to vegetation succession and abiotic changes. However, it is not well-known how TA communities and functional traits differ between unaffected and drying areas in different peatland types. Thus, we compared TA communities and functional traits in undrained control areas and areas (initially similar in vegetation and WT) subjected to moderate water level drawdown (WLD) for ∼20 years. The experiment covers a rich fen, a poor fen, and a bog. Arboreal vegetation has been established in the fen WLD areas. Taxonomic composition and functional traits differed between the WLD and control, most notably in the rich fen and the least in the bog, mirroring the vegetation. Eleven taxa favored WLD or pristine conditions; six taxa had a site-specific preference. Small tests and apertures, heterotrophy, and siliceous tests were more common in the WLD than control areas, but in the bog, these differences were not significant. Overall, besides drying, the establishment of arboreal vegetation and changes in abiotic conditions affected TA community and trait compositions in the fens, showing that they deliver information not only about water table depth but also sensitivity/resistance of peatlands. When aiming for quantitative water table reconstructions, account should be taken that the secondary changes amplify the signal of WLD in fens, whereas the resistance of vegetation and testate amoeba communities may hinder it in bogs, possibly causing bias when the reconstruction runs through a fen-bog-transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.