ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Exploring Knowledge and Comfort with Genital Anatomical Terminology Among Young Adults.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhancing genital anatomy literacy and comfort with using correct terminology is a common strategy in sexuality education to promote sexual health and well-being, yet individual variability in these competencies and their links to sexual health and well-being outcomes remain undocumented in young adulthood. This study assessed US emerging adults' (N = 516; 56.4% cisgender women, 31.3% cisgender men, 12.5% gender-diverse individuals) genital anatomy knowledge-categorizing responses as accurate, slang, unknown, or inaccurate-and their comfort with using correct terminology. It also examined links between knowledge, comfort, and six sexual health and well-being indicators: sexual self-efficacy in health-promoting behaviors, experiencing pleasure, and in refusing unwanted sexual activity; sexual satisfaction, sexual function difficulties, and respectful approaches to sexuality. Knowledge was higher for male (vs. female) anatomical parts and slang use was low overall but more common for male external genitalia. Gender differences emerged in both genital anatomy knowledge and comfort. Controlling for gender, greater knowledge and comfort with genital terminology were associated with higher sexual self-efficacy in health-promoting behaviors and experiencing pleasure, greater sexual satisfaction, and fewer sexual function difficulties. Additionally, comfort predicted resistive self-efficacy, while knowledge predicted more respectful approaches toward a partner. Implications for sexuality education and potential barriers to developing these competencies are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41422352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.