ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
An AI-driven multi-omics framework identifies lactylation-mediated therapeutic targets to overcome drug resistance in ovarian cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lactate-lactylation in tumor angiogenesis and progression: mechanisms, biomarker potential, and therapeutic implications.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells: Mechanisms of Progression and Therapeutic Strategies.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Metabolic-epigenetic crosstalk in latent autoimmune diabetes in adults: potential roles of lactate-induced histone lactylation in immune regulation and pancreatic β-cell fate.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lactylation, a recently identified histone modification derived from lactate metabolism, has emerged as a critical regulator of epigenetic reprogramming, tumor proliferation, and immune evasion. In ovarian cancer, lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) and other metabolic enzymes contribute to lactate accumulation, which supports chemotherapy resistance and disease progression. Although lactylation is increasingly linked to therapy failure, its precise molecular connection with ovarian cancer, as well as its therapeutic potential are unclear. Traditional analytical approaches often fail to integrate the complexity of multi-omics, limiting the discovery of actionable lactylation-associated vulnerabilities. This research aims to develop an AI-driven multi-omics framework to identify lactylation-related genes, stratify patient drug responses, and establish prognostic signatures in ovarian cancer. Transcriptomic, epigenomic, pharmacogenomic, mutation, and clinical outcome data were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC), and independent ovarian cancer cohorts. Deep learning models, including variational autoencoders (VAEs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Multitask Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs) (LSTM-MLP), were applied for molecular subtyping, survival analysis, and IC50 prediction. Findings were validated through pathway enrichment, mutation mapping, immune infiltration profiling, and structure-guided drug repurposing, the proposed method achieved precision of (0.955). Key lactylation-related genes, including LDHA and SLC16A3, were associated with immune exhaustion and cisplatin resistance. The Gln-TEx score and lactylation risk signature robustly predicted patient survival and drug response across TCGA and validation cohorts. Perturbation sensitivity and repurposing analyses revealed novel therapeutic vulnerabilities. This study establishes a precision oncology framework that integrates lactylation biology with AI-driven analytics to uncover druggable targets, enhance patient stratification, and inform the design of multi-target therapies in ovarian cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.