ArticleScientific reports2025
VENturing into machine learning for the morphological analysis of von Economo neurons.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Von Economo neurons (VENs) are a specialized type of large, highly elongated projection neurons located in specific cortical regions. Despite their implication in higher-order cognitive functions and psychiatric disorders in humans, consistent and objective identification criteria for VENs remain lacking. We analyzed 761 digitally reconstructed neurons from the NeuroMorpho.Org database. We applied six supervised machine learning algorithms and a convolutional neural network with Grad-CAM visualization to classify the reconstructions into VENs and pyramidal neurons. Variable importance was evaluated using information-driven and expert-based selection. We compared the classifications made by machine learning algorithms to the reconstructions' original labels. Reconstructions misclassified by the classifier models were further examined by a neuroanatomy expert. Machine learning models generally achieved high classification accuracy. Morphometric features such as dendritic length and number of stems emerged as some of the key discriminators. Expert ratings only partially aligned with machine findings, and there was low agreement between experts. Most misclassifications made by the classifier models were attributable to reconstruction artifacts or ambiguous morphology rather than model limitations. Our findings demonstrate the utility of combining machine learning with expert insight for distinguishing VENs from pyramidal neurons. While soma shape remains important for the characterization of VENs, classifier models revealed that dendritic architecture may be equally as specific and could help distinguish between borderline cases. This framework offers a replicable, data-driven method for studying VENs and can be utilized for future research on their distribution and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.