ArticleScientific reports2025
Interoceptive profiles of eating and weight disorders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Signals from the body’s interior undergo several interoceptive processing steps, from the periphery to the central nervous system, to conscious recognition and evaluation. Alterations in some of these steps have been reported for eating and weight disorders, but systematic comparisons between steps and disorders are necessary to develop targeted interventions. We recorded electrocardiogram and electroencephalogram from adult women with anorexia nervosa (AN; n = 38), bulimia nervosa (BN; n = 35), binge eating disorder (n = 22), obesity (OB; n = 20), and healthy control individuals (n = 46) during resting state and a heartbeat counting task. On the peripheral level, patients with AN, BN, and OB had reduced vagally-mediated heart-rate variability. On the central level, only patients with AN showed increased processing of heartbeats (heartbeat-evoked potentials). On the conscious level, there were no significant group differences in heartbeat-counting performance, beliefs, or insight, but a marked negative evaluation reported by patients with AN and BN. We conclude that fasting could serve to reduce negatively perceived (AN, BN) and increased (AN) bodily sensations. Overeating is not associated with marked alterations in cardiac interoception. The results do not support the notion of general interoceptive deficits, but rather disorder-specific interoceptive profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.