ArticleJournal of cannabis research2025
Changes in sleep quality during the 12 months following medical cannabis initiation.
Article in Journal of cannabis research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What sleep physicians need to know about cannabis use for sleep.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoor sleep quality is a commonly reported reason for medical cannabis (MC) use, yet evidence regarding its long-term impact on sleep remains limited. This study evaluated changes in subjective sleep quality over a 12-month period among adults initiating MC treatment in Pennsylvania and explored whether preferred route of administration and referring condition were associated with observed changes.
methodsA total of 137 adults newly referred for MC in PA completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Linear mixed effects models assessed changes in PSQI global and subscale scores over time. Additional models evaluated whether preferred administration route (oral vs. other) and referring condition (chronic pain, anxiety, PTSD) were associated with differences in observed outcomes.
resultsGlobal sleep quality scores, where higher values indicate poorer sleep quality, were significantly higher at baseline than at each follow-up point (p < .0001), with no significant differences among follow-up assessments, suggesting early and sustained improvements in self-reported sleep quality. Improvements were observed across all PSQI subscales. No significant relationships were found between sleep quality scores and either administration route or referring condition.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that MC may be associated with improvements in subjective sleep quality, though its impact did not vary as a function of administration route or primary referring condition. Additional research using objective sleep measures and controlled designs is needed to clarify MC's role in sleep quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.