ArticleLipids in health and disease2025
Risk prediction of multiple cardiometabolic diseases in middle-aged and older adults using lipid metabolism biomarkers and derived composite measures based on machine learning: a prospective cohort study of CHARLS.
Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cardiometabolic risk phenotype index integrating insulin resistance, systemic inflammation, and psychological burden for mortality risk stratification in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: an exploratory longitudinal analysis of a nationally representative cohort.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Cumulative exposure and patterns of the cholesterol-HDL-C-glucose index and risk of new-onset cardiometabolic multimorbidity: 9-year longitudinal evidence from CHARLS.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) has become an increasing global public health challenge. In China, the prevalence of CMM is rising rapidly among middle-aged and older adults, with estimates ranging from 11.6% to 16.9%, posing a substantial burden on both individuals and healthcare systems. However, effective tools for predicting individual risk of CMM remain limited, hindering timely prevention and intervention.
methodsThis study used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) between 2011 and 2015, including 7,913 participants aged ≥ 45 years without CMM at baseline. Incident CMM events were identified during the 2015 follow-up based on self-reported diagnoses of cardiometabolic diseases. Ten lipid metabolism biomarkers and derived composite indices (TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, TyG, TyG-BMI, LAP, CTI, non-HDL-C, and RC) were evaluated. Predictive models were estimated using logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine, naïve Bayes, deep learning (DL), and an ensemble model. The dataset was randomly split into training (75%) and validation (25%) subsets. Model discrimination was assessed using ROC curves and Area Under the Curve (AUC); calibration was evaluated with calibration plots and Brier scores; classification performance was examined using confusion matrices. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) were applied to assess clinical utility across risk thresholds. Feature importance ranking and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to quantify variable contributions, marginal effects, and feature interactions. In addition, regional variations in CMM incidence were illustrated using choropleth maps, and correlations between lipid markers and CMM prevalence were analyzed with Pearson coefficients and heatmaps.
resultsOver the four-year follow-up, 1,355 participants (17.1%) developed CMM. Compared with controls, incident cases were older, had a higher proportion of women and urban residents, and showed higher BMI. They also had significantly elevated triglycerides (126.6 vs. 101.8 mg/dL), reduced HDL-C (45.2 vs. 50.3 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and increased TyG-BMI and LAP (P < 0.001). Geographical analysis revealed markedly higher CMM incidence in northern cold regions (> 40%) than in southern regions (< 20%). The ensemble model achieved robust predictive performance (AUC = 0.715), followed closely by the DL model (AUC = 0.716) and GBM (AUC = 0.714). These non-linear models consistently outperformed GLM (AUC = 0.696), SVM (AUC = 0.696), and XGBoost (AUC = 0.683). Ensemble, DL, and RF models also demonstrated the best calibration (lowest Brier score, 0.125) and provided the greatest net benefit across risk thresholds. SHAP analysis indicated that composite indices, particularly TyG-BMI, LAP, and TyG, contributed most to risk prediction, whereas HDL-C exerted a protective effect. In contrast, traditional single lipid markers such as LDL-C and TC ranked lower in predictive importance.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that machine learning models incorporating lipid metabolism biomarkers and derived indices can predict the risk of CMM. Composite indicators such as TyG and LAP, which capture insulin resistance and visceral adiposity, showed superior predictive value. DL and ensemble models provided higher discrimination and clinical utility compared with traditional approaches. These models may enable early identification of high-risk individuals, underscoring the importance of lipid and metabolic management in CMM prevention, with potential implications for clinical decision-making and public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.