Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41422240›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2025

Deep learning to predict emergency department revisit using static and dynamic features (Deep Revisit): development and validation study.

Su-Yin Hsu, Jhe-Yi Jhu, Jun-Wan Gao, Chien-Hua Huang, Chu-Lin Tsai, Li-Chen Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Su-Yin HsuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, CSIE Der Tian Hall No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei, 106319, Taiwan.
Jhe-Yi JhuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, CSIE Der Tian Hall No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei, 106319, Taiwan.
Jun-Wan GaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 7 Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Chien-Hua HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 7 Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Chu-Lin TsaiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 7 Zhongshan S. Rd, Taipei, 100, Taiwan. chulintsai@ntuh.gov.tw.
Li-Chen FuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, CSIE Der Tian Hall No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei, 106319, Taiwan. lichen@ntu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Department (ED) revisits represent a critical issue in emergency medicine. Identifying high-risk revisit cases (revisits with intensive care unit admissions, cardiac arrest, or requiring emergency surgery) is particularly important. While prior studies have explored machine learning models for ED revisit prediction, few deep learning approaches exist, and dynamic features remain underutilized.

methodsWe used data from National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH), incorporating both static (e.g., age, sex, triage) and dynamic (vital signs) features. A preprocessing strategy was developed to handle temporal irregularities. We proposed a hybrid deep learning model combining Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) and feature tokenizer (FT)-Transformer to integrate static and short-term dynamic information.

resultsWe evaluated our model on NTUH 2016-2019 data, achieving the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.8453 and the area under precision recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.0935 for high-risk revisits (base rate = 0.01), and AUROC of 0.7250 and AUPRC of 0.2005 for general revisits (base rate = 0.042). The model maintained robust performance when validated on 2020-2022 data. Compared to the static-only logistic regression baseline, our model improved AUPRC from 0.0288 to 0.0935 and precision from 0.0281 to 0.0428.

conclusionOur model significantly outperformed the static-only baseline. It demonstrates the effectiveness of multimodal clinical data fusion in improving ED revisit prediction and supporting clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Deep learningEmergency department revisitHybrid modelTime series data

Identifiers

PMID41422240
PMCPMC12750547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.