ArticleBioData mining2025
Deep learning to predict emergency department revisit using static and dynamic features (Deep Revisit): development and validation study.
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency Department (ED) revisits represent a critical issue in emergency medicine. Identifying high-risk revisit cases (revisits with intensive care unit admissions, cardiac arrest, or requiring emergency surgery) is particularly important. While prior studies have explored machine learning models for ED revisit prediction, few deep learning approaches exist, and dynamic features remain underutilized.
methodsWe used data from National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH), incorporating both static (e.g., age, sex, triage) and dynamic (vital signs) features. A preprocessing strategy was developed to handle temporal irregularities. We proposed a hybrid deep learning model combining Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) and feature tokenizer (FT)-Transformer to integrate static and short-term dynamic information.
resultsWe evaluated our model on NTUH 2016-2019 data, achieving the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.8453 and the area under precision recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.0935 for high-risk revisits (base rate = 0.01), and AUROC of 0.7250 and AUPRC of 0.2005 for general revisits (base rate = 0.042). The model maintained robust performance when validated on 2020-2022 data. Compared to the static-only logistic regression baseline, our model improved AUPRC from 0.0288 to 0.0935 and precision from 0.0281 to 0.0428.
conclusionOur model significantly outperformed the static-only baseline. It demonstrates the effectiveness of multimodal clinical data fusion in improving ED revisit prediction and supporting clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.