ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Translation and cultural adaptation of the I-CAM-Q: the first Hungarian version for assessing complementary and alternative medicine use.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe International Questionnaire to Measure the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q) is a standardized tool for assessing CAM use. While it has been adapted into several languages, this study presents the first Hungarian translation and cultural adaptation. Given the growing interest in CAM in Hungary, a validated Hungarian version is essential for accurate data collection and informed healthcare policy.
methodsThe I-CAM-Q was translated into Hungarian using a rigorous forward–backward translation protocol involving expert translators, proofreaders, and a reconciliation panel. The final version was pilot-tested among healthy volunteer healthcare workers from ophthalmology departments. The questionnaires were used to assess clarity, cultural relevance, and reliability in this cross-sectional study. Individuals with diagnosed eye diseases were excluded.
resultsAmong ophthalmologically healthy volunteers, 77.8% consulted physicians in the past 12 months, while 8.9% visited chiropractors and spiritual healers, and 2.2% consulted acupuncturists. In the past 3 months, physicians remained the most consulted (73.7%), followed by chiropractors (53.3%). CAM therapies were mainly used for general well-being and acute conditions, with high satisfaction 75–100% of users rated chiropractic, acupuncture, and spiritual healing as “very useful.” Phytomedicines were used primarily for acute illness (41.7%) and general well-being (27.1%), with 68.1% of users rating them as very useful. Dietary supplements were widely consumed, especially Vitamin D (62.9%) and Vitamin C (57.1%), mainly for prevention (46.2%) and general health (38.5%). Meditation and relaxation techniques were also commonly practiced, with 92.3% and 69.2% of users, respectively, rating them as very useful.
conclusionsThe Hungarian version of the I-CAM-Q was successfully translated, culturally adapted, and validated. It provides a reliable tool for assessing CAM use in Hungary and supports further research into CAM practices and their integration into healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.