ArticleMovement ecology2025
Unexpected migration patterns in a high-latitude breeding songbird: evidence from multi-sensor geolocators and isotopes.
Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMigratory birds often exhibit within-species variation in migration routes and non-breeding areas, yet the mechanisms shaping these patterns remain poorly understood, particularly in high-latitude breeding populations. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain why birds follow particular routes: optimal migration theory proposes that routes minimizing time or energy expenditure are favored, whereas the historical contingency hypothesis posits that routes are shaped by past range expansion, sometimes resulting in "suboptimal" migrations. We investigated whether distance minimization or historical contingency more strongly influenced migration routes in high-latitude breeding myrtle warblers (Setophaga coronata coronata), which indirect evidence previously suggested follow a shorter route to the Pacific Coast rather than the core Gulf Coast nonbreeding area.
methodsWe tracked the migrations of six Alaskan myrtle warblers using geolocators measuring both light and atmospheric pressure and inferred nonbreeding areas using hydrogen isotopes for a larger sample of birds breeding in Alaska, British Columbia, and Alberta (n = 167). Additionally, we compared migration tracks derived from light-level data exclusively with those that incorporated atmospheric pressure.
resultsContrary to expectations, all geolocator-tracked birds and most with stable isotope data migrated to the southeastern United States, with just 5% of individuals possibly wintering on the Pacific Coast. Using pressure data allowed us to resolve migration routes and timing more precisely than traditional light-level methods, while also elucidating flight altitude and fine-scale elevational movements.
conclusionsWe found that myrtle warblers breeding in northwestern North America migrate farther than previously thought, despite being generally regarded as a relatively short-distance migrant. Our findings contradict previous studies that suggested myrtle warblers breeding in Alaska and northern British Columbia typically follow a shorter migration route to the Pacific Coast. This seemingly suboptimal route-similar to routes followed by the few other songbirds tracked from the region-is consistent with the historical contingency hypothesis, which proposes that migration routes reflect past range expansions. We recommend that researchers conducting geolocation studies leverage tags with barometers, as the additional atmospheric pressure data greatly improved our ability to characterize migration at a fine scale over the full annual cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.