ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Effectiveness of oseltamivir in hospitalised obstetric patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using a Brazilian national database.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective, safe, and accessible antivirals are needed to treat pregnant/postpartum (obstetric) patients with COVID-19, a group at high risk for severe disease. Newer antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir) are expensive and less accessible in low- and middle-income countries, including Brazil. Oseltamivir, a cheap, widely available, pregnancy-safe anti-influenza medication, was used off-label for COVID-19 in Brazil. The primary outcome was comparing in-hospital all-cause mortality in hospitalised obstetric patients with COVID-19 treated with oseltamivir versus no antivirals. Secondary outcomes were comparing the risk of progression to severe disease (ICU admission or death, whichever occurred first) and hospital discharge.
methodsIn this retrospective matched cohort study using Brazil’s national surveillance database (SIVEP-Gripe), we identified hospitalised obstetric patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 between February 2020 and October 2023. Patients first receiving oseltamivir on day zero of admission and admitted within seven days of symptom onset were matched 1:1 using propensity scores to patients receiving no antivirals at all.
resultsAfter matching, 445 oseltamivir recipients and 445 controls were included, of whom 79.5% and 80.0%, respectively, were admitted in 2020, and 65.8% and 67.9% had non-severe COVID-19 on admission (SpO2 > 94%). Oseltamivir use was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77; [95% CI 0.51–1.17], p = 0.22; absolute risk reduction [ARR] 3.9%) and progression to severe disease (HR 0.83 [95% CI [0.67–1.01], p = 0.07; ARR 4.5%) compared with no antivirals, though these associations were not statistically significant overall. Oseltamivir recipients were less likely to be discharged on days 0–2 (HR 0.68 [0.52–0.90]) but more likely to be discharged on or after day 3 (HR 1.30 [1.10–1.54]) than controls. Significant associations between oseltamivir use and lower in-hospital mortality were observed in two subgroups: patients admitted in 2020 (HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.32–0.93], p = 0.03) and patients with non-severe COVID-19 (SpO2 > 94%) on admission (HR 0.33 [95% CI 0.12–0.89], p = 0.03).
conclusionsIn obstetric patients with COVID-19, oseltamivir used within seven days of symptom onset was associated with non-statistically significant lower risk of in-hospital death and progression to severe disease, compared with no antivirals. Results of this study do not support use of oseltamivir to treat COVID-19 in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.