ArticleScientific reports2025
Location and capacity optimization of urban sanitation robot base stations using improved NSGA-II.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional sanitation systems are increasingly challenged by contemporary waste collection demands, owing to limited service capacity, high operational costs, and uneven resource distribution. Sanitation robots, capable of high-precision waste identification and multi-robot collaboration, offer a promising alternative to improve collection efficiency. Their performance, however, critically depends on the scientific layout of base stations. This study proposes a multi-objective location and capacity optimization model based on an improved NSGA-II, incorporating multi-source data such as population density and spatiotemporal waste distribution. To strengthen the algorithm's adaptability to complex urban environments, a self-adaptive crossover operator and a dynamic objective weighting mechanism are introduced. The TOPSIS method is then applied to evaluate and rank Pareto-optimal solutions, yielding an optimal layout and capacity plan for base stations. An empirical analysis in Lixia District, Jinan City, demonstrates that the optimized scheme reduces the number of facilities by one, improves service utility, and decreases the number of uncovered demand points to eight. Compared with existing planning approaches, the proposed model proves effective in dynamic scenarios and provides a collaborative multi-objective optimization framework for smart urban sanitation planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.