Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41422156›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Present-day vertical land motions (VLM) of the Chesapeake Bay region derived from robust network imaging of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) observations.

Karen Williams, D Sarah Stamps, James Duda, Corné Kreemer, William B Moore, Philippe Hensel, Thomas Herring, Thomas E McKenna, Madeline Kronebusch, David C Walters and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karen WilliamsGeodesy and Tectonophysics Laboratory, Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
D Sarah StampsGeodesy and Tectonophysics Laboratory, Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. dstamps@vt.edu.
James DudaU.S. Geological Survey Virginia and West Virginia Water Science Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Corné KreemerNevada Geodetic Laboratory, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
William B MooreDepartment of Atmospheric and Planetary Science, Hampton University, Hampton, VA, USA.
Philippe HenselNOAA National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Thomas HerringDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Thomas E McKennaDelaware Geological Survey, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Madeline KronebuschGeodesy and Tectonophysics Laboratory, Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
David C WaltersU.S. Geological Survey Eastern Ecological Science Center, Laurel, MD, USA.
Joel CarrU.S. Geological Survey Eastern Ecological Science Center, Laurel, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Chesapeake Bay region (defined as longitudes − 78° to -74° and latitudes 36.5° to 40°) experiences the highest rates of relative sea-level rise (RSLR) on the Atlantic Coast. Regional land subsidence influences RSLR, however quantified rates of vertical land motions (VLM) are inconsistent in published solutions. For 5 years from 2019 to 2023, new Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) campaign data were collected at over 60 sites across the Chesapeake Bay region annually. These data were processed and combined with continuous GNSS data (120 stations) from the region covering the same time-period using GAMIT-GLOBK to produce 3D velocities and their associated uncertainties. We use the Robust Network Imaging algorithm to interpolate GNSS-derived VLM to produce a new regional VLM solution of the Chesapeake Bay region. We find that land subsidence is ubiquitous throughout the region with rates varying from − 2.97 to -0.40 mm/yr. In major cities across the Chesapeake Bay region, VLM rates are − 1.1 ± 1.6 mm/yr (1-sigma) for Washington DC, -0.8 ± 1.4 mm/yr for Baltimore, MD, -2.4 ± 0.5 mm/yr for Ocean City, MD, and − 2.3 ± 1.0 mm/yr for Hampton, VA. When we compare our VLM rates with a geodetic-based solution from 1974, we observe meaningful shifts in the locations and rates of maximum subsidence. The results of this work underscore that regular monitoring of VLM and can be used to improve projections of relative sea-level changes as well as the associated coastal hazards for communities in the Chesapeake Bay region.

Indexed as

Chesapeake bayCoastal hazardsGNSSSubsidenceVertical land motionVLM

Identifiers

PMID41422156
PMCPMC12820030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.