ArticleScientific reports2025
The coronaviral landscape across diverse mammalian species in the Northeastern United States.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SARS-CoV-2 virus infection ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) across a broad mammalian host range has prompted concern that parallel evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in animals could reignite a surge in human infection. We conducted surveillance studies to describe the coronaviral landscape of wild and domestic animals (n = 889; 27 species) in the Northeastern United States. We focused on the white-footed mouse (WFM) and supplemented surveillance with laboratory infection studies to assess intra-and interspecies transmission of ancestral and Omicron variants. We detected a range of coronaviruses in fecal swabs, oral swabs or stool specimens from seven species. We did not detect SARS-CoV-2 in any animal. Infection of WFM with SARS-CoV-2 confirmed their susceptibility to ancestral and Omicron variants, however viral RNA shedding declined with the latter. Intraspecies transmission was achieved only with the ancestral strain. Neither strain could be transmitted across species. Free-living WFM experienced a 4% infection rate with a recently described Peromyscus Betacoronavirus with high similarity to HCoV-OC43. We failed to achieve in vivo infection of WFM with HCoV-OC43 indicating that WFM are unlikely to transmit this virus. Our data support a model in which evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in humans may be accompanied by its declining foothold within the animal virome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.