Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41422134›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Factors associated with herbal usage among hypertensive and diabetic patients in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: A cross-sectional study.

Aris Widayati, Ingenida Hadning, Erna Tri Wulandari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aris WidayatiPharmacy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. ariswidayati@umy.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-9706
Ingenida HadningPharmacy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8177-0693
Erna Tri WulandariFaculty of Pharmacy, Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-5799

Funding

DRTPM Dikti 2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbal or traditional medicine (TM) is widely used among chronic disease patients. The Indonesian government actively supports the development and integration of herbal remedies, including phytopharmaceuticals, into the national healthcare system. The support is grounded on Law Number 17 of 2023, which delineates the role of natural medicines. The purpose of the study is to describe the use of TM and the factors associated with TM use among hypertensive and diabetic patients in Yogyakarta City, Indonesia. This study is a cross-sectional design. The respondents were patients with hypertension or diabetes mellitus, and comorbidities were excluded. They were selected conveniently when they attended the Primary Health Centre (PHC) in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Data were gathered between July and August 2024 using a pretested questionnaire. The measured variables included TM use and the following variables: gender, age, education level, income level, TM knowledge, source of TM information, family support, neighborhood support, friends and other social support networks, and medication adherence. Data were analysed using descriptive, bivariate Chi-square, and multivariate logistic regression. Ninety-nine hypertensive and 100 diabetic patients resulted in 199 study participants. All participants used prescription medicines, and 51% (n = 199) reported using TM. The use of TM was 47% and 56% in hypertensive and diabetic patients, respectively. The most commonly used TMs were cucumber (36%) and garlic (18%) for hypertensive patients, while bitter melon (28%) and ginger (10%) were for diabetic patients. Several main reasons for TM use were feeling healthier (59%), hereditary from the family (13%), cheap (6%), easy to obtain (6%), easy to make by themselves (6%), minimal side effects (6%), and taste good (6%). As many as 68% and 61% hypertensive people had good adherence among TM and non-TM users, respectively. In diabetic individuals, 50% and 54% have good adherence for TM and non-TM users, respectively. The study indicated there was no significant association between various factors and the use of TM in hypertensive and diabetic patients. Gender, age, education level, income level, adherence to prescription medication, and support from family and friends were not significantly associated with the use of TM. For hypertensive patients, peer support and TM information sources show significant bivariate relationships with TM use, while for diabetic patients, personal knowledge and information sources are key factors. Multivariate analysis reveals no independent predictors for TM use in diabetes, but the TM information source emerges as the sole dominant predictor in hypertension (OR: 5.67, p = 0.018). The findings highlight the critical importance of information channels in facilitating the adoption of TM among hypertensive patients, with exposure significantly increasing the likelihood of usage. The absence of independent predictors in diabetes after adjustment indicates that various factors, such as knowledge and support, may interact in complex ways, thereby diminishing the impact of individual factors. Healthcare providers must prioritize verifying the quality of TM information through reliable channels to reduce risks.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHypertensionMedicine, TraditionalPhytotherapyAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndonesiaMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesDiabetesHerbalHypertensionTraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID41422134
PMCPMC12816713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.