ArticleScientific reports2025
HMLA: A hybrid machine learning approach for enhancing stroke prediction models with missing data imputation techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate stroke prediction is critical to reduce death and disability risk, despite the presence of irrelevant and sparse information in clinical datasets that often undermines model performance. The novel machine learning approach is proposed for stroke prediction in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) dataset. The proposed approach consists of two steps. The important features are selected using the Information Gain Ratio (IGR) during the preprocessing, and missing data handled by K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), which also helps to enhance data integrity as well computing efficiency. Following the classification phase, a Deep Neural Network (DNN) model is trained on the preprocessed information to predict stroke risk. After classification, a DNN model is further trained using preprocessed data to predict the risk of stroke. Model assessment was based on a combined 10-fold nested cross-validation scheme for unbiased internal validation and to avoid data leakage. The effectiveness of the model was evaluated by seven statistical indices, false positive rate, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, accuracy and AUC-ROC comparison with classical classification methods. Although the developed framework at this study achieved an accuracy of 94.32%, precision of 95.96%, F1-score of 95.00%, specificity of 94.67% and sensitivity of 94.06%, the study is restricted to internal validation and a single optimizer (ALO), necessitating more assessment on external datasets. The findings indicate that the hybrid IGR-KNN-DNN framework offers strong predictive potential and computational efficiency for early stroke-risk assessment, with additional validation enhancing its clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.