ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Clinical characteristics of extremely elderly versus normal elderly patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: a single-center real-event retrospective study.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients aged ≥ 80 years (extremely elderly) is debated. This study compared outcomes between extremely elderly and younger elderly (60-79 years) patients.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 367 patients (133 ≥ 80y, 234 60-79y) undergoing EVT were analyzed. Propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics. Primary endpoints were one-year major adverse limb events (MALEs) and mortality. Univariate Cox analysis identified MALE-associated factors.
resultsAfter matching, the ≥ 80y group had more complex lesions (longer occlusions, poorer runoff). Their one-year freedom from MALEs (44.721% vs 61.697%, p = 0.053) and freedom from mortality rates(77.191% vs 85.628%, p = 0.215) were lower. Univariate analysis indicated age ≥ 80y (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.38, P = 0.043) and TASC II C/D lesions (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.55, P = 0.035) increased MALE risk, while drug-coated balloons((HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85, P = 0.001). and Lipid lowering agents usage (HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.98, P = 0.041) were protective. Postoperative psychiatric symptoms were more frequent in the ≥ 80y group. Critically, both groups showed significant and comparable improvements in pain scores and functional capacity after EVT.
conclusionsDespite higher risks, EVT meaningfully improves quality of life in extremely elderly CLTI patients. Treatment should not be denied based on age alone, but should be individualized considering the higher anatomical complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.