Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41422079›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Taxonomic reassessment of captive sugar gliders using genetic analyses and complementary acoustic data.

Miroslav Mulko, Irena Schneiderová, Barbora Černá Bolfíková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miroslav MulkoFaculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. mulko@ftz.czu.cz.
Irena SchneiderováFaculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5485-7630
Barbora Černá BolfíkováFaculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Internal Grant Agency of FTZ CZU IGA20253125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate species identification is crucial for managing ex-situ populations, especially in cryptic species complexes where taxonomic uncertainty may compromise conservation. The sugar glider (Petaurus breviceps s.l.) is a small nocturnal marsupial commonly bred in zoos and is popular in the exotic pet trade. Recent taxonomic revisions revealed substantial cryptic diversity within the complex, raising concerns about species identity and geographic origin of captive individuals. We used an integrative approach combining genetic and acoustic analyses to assess the taxonomic status of captive P. breviceps s.l. populations. Phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial ND2 and ND4 genes showed a strong genetic affinity between European and United States captive populations, suggesting a shared origin within the New Guinean lineage. These findings support their reclassification as Petaurus papuanus. Despite their captive origin, these populations showed unexpectedly high haplotype diversity, likely due to repeated introductions from genetically distinct but geographically close wild populations. However, within-group homogeneity indicates limited genetic exchange among breeding lines. Acoustic analyses of the barking call revealed intraspecific variability but little species-specificity, indicating a minor role in reproductive isolation. Our findings underscore the importance of taxonomic clarity and structured genetic management for conserving captive population integrity.

Indexed as

Vocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsAnimals, ZooGenetic VariationHaplotypesPhylogenySpecies SpecificityBioacousticsCaptive breedingGenetic diversityMarsupialiaPetauridaePet trade

Identifiers

PMID41422079
PMCPMC12748748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.