ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Interpretable machine learning for differentiating SCA3 and MSA-C using gait and postural features from wearable sensors.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-Based Interventions in Patients with Ataxic Conditions: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Demographic Shortcuts Account for Most of the Apparent Accuracy of Four-Class Gait-Based Differential Diagnosis in Neurodegenerative Disease: An Interpretability-Driven Audit of Machine Learning on a Public Gait Benchmark.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital Balance Biomarkers and Interpretable Evaluation of Disease Severity in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) and the cerebellar subtype of multiple system atrophy (MSA-C) both manifest with cerebellar ataxia and postural instability in the early stages, leading to considerable clinical overlap and frequent misdiagnosis or delayed intervention. Current diagnostic tools offer limited support when genetic confirmation is unavailable or neuroimaging findings are inconclusive. Clinical rating scales, while commonly used, rely heavily on subjective judgment and lack sensitivity to dynamic monitoring. Therefore, this study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning model based on gait and postural features acquired through wearable sensors, in order to assist in distinguishing SCA3 from MSA-C and to explore their potential as digital biomarkers for clinical application.
methodsThis study included 74 individuals diagnosed with SCA3, 43 individuals with multiple system atrophy of MSA-C, and 45 age-matched healthy controls (HC). All participants were in the mild to moderate stages of disease. Gait and postural control data were collected using a wearable smart insole system, and 98 digital features were extracted. Classification models were developed using XGBoost, LightGBM, random forest, and logistic regression. To enhance model interpretability, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to quantify the contribution of each feature and to identify the most informative digital biomarkers.
resultAmong all models, LightGBM achieved the highest accuracy (95.91%) and ROC-AUC (0.9962). SHAP analysis identified Cadence CV and center of pressure (COP) features under eyes-closed (EC) conditions as top contributors across all models, supporting their potential as digital biomarkers. Gait and postural features provided complementary information. Even at mild to moderate disease stages, individuals with SCA3 and those with MSA-C showed distinguishable motor patterns. Specifically, individuals with SCA3 exhibited greater medio-lateral (ML) postural instability under visual deprivation, while those with MSA-C showed increased variability in gait rhythm, indicating distinct movement phenotypes.
conclusionThe integration of gait and postural stability features with interpretable machine learning models enables effective differentiation between SCA3 and MSA-C. It also facilitates the identification of clinically relevant digital biomarkers, supporting early diagnosis and personalized rehabilitation planning in cerebellar ataxia. Clinical trial number NTC04010214.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.