Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41422052›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025

Reverse watershed method applied to thoracoscopic S9 segmentectomy: a retrospective study.

Jing Huang, Jun Xu, Zijian Li, Yongsen Li, Tian Xia, Yuan Chen, Jun Zhao, Ziqing Shen, Cheng Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jing Huang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Jun Xu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Zijian LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Yongsen LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Tian XiaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Yuan ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Jun ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Ziqing ShenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China. szq961221@126.com.
Cheng DingDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China. cding@suda.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly tumors less than 2 cm in diameter, sublobar resection-including wedge resection and segmentectomy-is often the preferred surgical approach. The difficulty of pulmonary segmentectomy lies in identifying the intersegmental planes. Among all segmental resections, S9 resection is considered one of the most challenging due to the cone-like structure of the S9 segment and its deeply hidden segmental portal. To address this, we designed a modified technique that identifies the S9 segmental plane by temporarily and sequentially occluding A9 + 10 and V10 intraoperatively, thereby avoiding dissection of the S9 segmental hilum. This method, which differs from traditional intersegmental plane identification based on occluding individual segmental arteries or veins, is termed the reverse watershed method. We compared it with the modified inflation-collapse method to explore its advantages and disadvantages in S9 resection.

methodsWe retrospectively collected 87 cases of thoracoscopic S9 resection. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the method used for intersegmental plane identification: the modified inflation-collapse method group and the reverse watershed method group. Various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative indicators were compared between the two groups.

resultsEighty-seven patients with surgical data were included: 49 operated using the modified inflation-collapse technique and 34 using the reverse watershed method. Preoperative baseline characteristics showed no significant intergroup differences. Intraoperatively, the reverse watershed method group exhibited a reduced mean operative duration (p < 0.01) and diminished intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.01). Postoperatively, this group showed a lower incidence of air leaks, decreased chest tube drainage volume, and reduced pain severity compared to the modified inflation-collapse group. No significant differences were observed in the duration of chest tube retention, length of postoperative hospitalization, or loss of lung function at the 3-month postoperative review.

conclusionsCompared to the modified inflation-collapse technique, the reverse watershed method reduces operative time and intraoperative bleeding in S9 resection, decreases the incidence of postoperative air leaks, and results in comparable preservation of lung function.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEarly-stage non-small-cell lung cancerIntersegmental planeS9 segmental resectionThoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41422052
PMCPMC12838450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.