Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41422040›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025

Diaphragmatic pacing system from the point of view of the patients: 14 years of clinical experience and follow-up.

Giuliana Stagni, Francesco Curto, Matteo Giacomini, Federico Pozzi, Arturo Chieregato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giuliana StagniEquipe Riabilitazione Respiratoria, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Francesco CurtoAnestesia E Rianimazione Ospedale Di Vimercate-ASST Della Brianza, Vimercate, Italy.
Matteo GiacominiTerapia Intensiva. Policlinico San Marco, Zingonia, Italy.
Federico PozziDipartimento Neuroscienze, Dipartimento Anestesia, Terapia Intensiva Ad Indirizzo Neurologico/Neurochirurgico, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Arturo ChieregatoDipartimento Neuroscienze, Dipartimento Anestesia, Terapia Intensiva Ad Indirizzo Neurologico/Neurochirurgico, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy. arturo.chieregato@ospedaleniguarda.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh cervical spinal diseases (C1-C4), resulting in paralysis of the respiratory muscles, makes the person dependent on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for life support. Although effective from a ventilatory point of view, IMV is associated with increased morbidity and mortality; ventilated patients have higher rates of respiratory complications, a significant reduction in life expectancy, and above all, a serious psychological repercussion with estrangement from the world. Diaphragmatic pacing system (DPS) is a well-established technique capable of restoring paraphysiological ventilation. AIM OF THE STUDY: A narrative review of the case history and their follow-up of 13 patients dependent on life support ventilation who have been implanted since 2011 in the Neurocritical Care Unit of the Niguarda Hospital, Milan.

resultsDiaphragmatic pacing system was successful implanted in all the patients: of them 9 were affected by traumatic cervical SCI, 2 by Arnold Chiari sequelae, 1 due to a spontaneous ischemia. One patient with Pompe disease was included although his pathophysiology primarly affects the diaphragm instead the high cervical spine tract. During the 14 years follow-up, 92% of patients (12/13) used DPS and in 42 % of them (5/12 patients) we were able to be disconnected from IMV for at least 12 h. One of the patients (7.7%) was completely weaned from IMV and the tracheostomy was finally removed. One patient needed hospitalization for a respiratory complication. All the patients perceived their quality of life to be excellent or good. DISCUSSION: The long-term follow-up of 13 patients with DPS suggests that the implant could be a potential long-term alternative to IMV, particularly in terms of quality of life. The diaphragmatic stimulator protects from IMV associated respiratory complications, therefore reducing hospitalization. Allowing spontaneous breathing for a variable number of hours enables the caregiver to support the individual more effectively, facilitating their reintegration into daily social and work activities. Diaphragmatic pacing system does not eliminate the disability but allows for more independent years of life with a greater possibility of social reintegration.

Indexed as

Cervical spine injuryDiaphragm pacingFollow upInvasive Mechanical ventilationLong term outcomeNeurocritical careQuality of lifeRespiratory complicationsTracheostomyWeaning from ventilation

Identifiers

PMID41422040
PMCPMC12831427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.