ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
A novel prosthetic foot with a flexible rubber ankle for the Indonesian population: a finite element analysis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProsthetic foot design is crucial for enhancing mobility in individuals with lower limb amputations. However, many existing designs struggle to replicate the natural flexibility and energy return of the human ankle. This study aimed to develop a novel prosthetic foot optimized for the Indonesian population, incorporating a flexible rubber ankle to better mimic human ankle motion and improve energy efficiency.
methodsThe prosthetic foot design featured an aluminum alloy and a rubber filler at the ankle joint. The rubber filler was modeled as a hyperelastic material using the Mooney-Rivlin model. Finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to simulate quasi-static loading across various stance phases of the gait cycle. Stress distribution and deformation were analyzed to evaluate the prosthetic foot’s performance.
resultsFEA simulations revealed that deformation was primarily concentrated around the ankle, peaking during the terminal stance phase. The rubber ankle demonstrated effective energy absorption and return, with 80.78% of the energy returned during the terminal stance phase. This indicates a high level of efficiency in replicating natural ankle behavior.
conclusionThe novel prosthetic foot design, featuring a flexible rubber ankle, successfully mimics human ankle flexibility and enhances energy return during gait. This design holds significant potential for improving mobility and comfort for the Indonesian population, particularly during the critical terminal stance phase of walking. Further experimental validation and real-world testing are recommended to confirm its performance and applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.