ArticleBMC oral health2025
Examination of new clinical dental caries in school children using real intra oral photos with artificial intelligence model YOLO-V8x.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Dental Caries Detection Across Clinical Imaging Modalities: A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental caries is a common chronic condition among school children, and in Indonesia, rates have been higher than 80%. Traditional diagnostic techniques tend to be long and dependent upon the availability of healthcare professionals and hence promote development of alternatives involving artificial intelligence (AI). This work aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the application titled HI Bogi that embeds the model known as YOLOv8 in distinguishing dental caries among primary school pupils in Cimahi, Indonesia. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional analytic model with prospectively collected data was adopted. A dataset consisting of 3,221 JPG photographs was created and labeled based on the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS, D0 - D6) using Roboflow software. The photographs were resized to a size of 640 × 640 pixels and distributed into training (2,266 photographs), validation (635 photographs), and testing (320 photographs) sets. A YOLOv8x algorithm was used for application in deep learning tasks, and its performance was determined through mean Average Precision (mAP), Intersection over Union (IoU) measurements, and precision and recall metrics. Additionally, a Mann Whitney statistical test was carried out to contrast classification efficiency between the AI system and dental practitioners' classification efficacy, while both methods' diagnostic speed was tested.
resultsmAP was 45.8%, and precision was 72.6%, and recall was 41.1% for YOLOv8x model. Comparative testing across ICDAS categories did not vary significantly between dentists and AI (p > 0.05). Detection of caries (D1-D6) was observed to have a sensitivity ranged from 82.31% to 96.45% and specificity ranged from 77.10% to 99.33% on new data. Additionally, testing was completed approximately four times faster with AI compared to manual testing (p = 0.000).
conclusionThe YOLOv8x model in the HI Bogi app demonstrated diagnostic performance equal to dentists and a drastically shortened examination time, validating its use in school-based dental health programs. But class-specific precision variation suggests further refinement is needed. Further studies ought to increase datasets and characterize advanced architecture, such as transformer-based architecture, to achieve higher specificity and detection rates in rare lesion categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.