ArticleChest2026
From Pulse to Phenotype: Sleep Apnea Endotyping for Polygraphy via Oximeter-Derived Autonomic Arousal.
Article in Chest, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Loop Gain in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: From Physiological Endotype to Clinical Translation.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the underlying cause of OSA in the individual patient, referred to as pathophysiologic endotyping, is essential for personalized care. The current classification of these traits from routine sleep recordings relies on manually scored arousals from sleep. Automating this process could widen the applicability of endotyping. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can analyzing autonomic variability, derived from finger oximeter photoplethysmography (PPG), accurately classify sleep apnea pathophysiologic endotypes with results comparable with the established EEG-based method? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsEighty-seven patients referred for suspected OSA underwent ambulatory polysomnography. Pulse wave amplitude, pulse rate, and pulse propagation time were derived from the PPG pulse waveform. A logistic mixed-effect model was developed to predict the presence of EEG-based arousals after respiratory events using these PPG-derived parameters, together with the associated event type and blood oxygen saturation. The automatically predicted PPG-based arousals then were incorporated into an established model (Phenotyping Using Polysomnography) to determine OSA endotypic traits from the airflow and PPG-based signals. The agreement between endotypes with PPG-based and EEG-based arousals was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
resultsPPG-derive pulse wave responses to respiratory events were more pronounced in the presence of arousal (P < .001 for all). The model using PPG metrics to predict cortical arousal demonstrated moderate performance (sensitivity, 0.71; specificity, 0.59). Endotypic traits derived by PPG-derived arousals showed strong agreement compared with the EEG-derived reference (ICC for loop gain at 1 cycle/min, 0.95 [95% CI, [0.88-0.98]; ICC for ventilation at active muscle activity, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99]; ICC for ventilation at passive muscle activity, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.99-0.99]; ICC for ventilation at minimum muscle activity, 0.99 [0.99-0.99]; ICC for arousal threshold, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.48-0.96]; ICC for muscle compensation, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.60-0.91]).
interpretationOur results show that using pulse wave features instead of manually scored EEG-based arousals in respiratory modelling allows for accurately determining OSA endotypes. This approach might enable physiologic endotyping in non-EEG-based sleep studies, expanding the accessibility of personalized OSA management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.