ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2026
Small data, big challenges: Machine- and deep-learning strategies for data-limited drug discovery.
Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- HRSC advances · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Accelerating the clinical translation of bioengineered anticancer therapeutics.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven cancer diagnostics with improved robustness and interpretability.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Aided Drug Repurposing for Screening COX-2 Inhibitors from Traditional Chinese Medicines.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Toward an AI Era: Application of Artificial Intelligence in Inclusion Complex Screening.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Biophysical Sensing Tools in Drug Discovery: Integrating Kinetics, Thermodynamics, Cellular Target Engagement and Structure.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Natural Products in Epilepsy Treatment: From Traditional Medicine Towards Computational Drug Discovery.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Training the next-generation of biomedical scientists through artificial intelligence-driven education and research in pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
- The eight pillars of within-host tuberculosis modelling.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in drug discovery from advanced molecular representation to pipeline applications.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Formulation-Driven Innovation in Antifungal Therapy: From Nanotechnology to AI-Assisted Design.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Opening the black box: insights into ubiquitin-mediated control of innate antiviral immunity and AI-enhanced therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A critical bottleneck limiting the potential of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models within the drug discovery and development (DDD) pipeline is the scarcity of high-quality experimental data. Limited data is not an anomaly but an inherent characteristic of the DDD process. Significant financial costs, time, and confidentiality concerns limit the scale of available datasets. Applying standard ML and DL algorithms directly to these small datasets presents substantial challenges. Traditional ML models remain constrained by their dependence on handcrafted features and limited ability to capture complex biological relationships. In contrast, DL algorithms that assume data abundance are prone to overfitting and poor generalization when trained on small datasets. The small data problem thus represents a fundamental constraint that shapes the practical utility and trustworthiness of AI applications in DDD. While prior reviews have surveyed the broad landscape of AI and ML in drug discovery, a significant gap exists concerning the small data challenge across the DDD pipeline. Addressing this challenge requires adapting DL methods that typically assume data abundance, while also extending traditional ML approaches that, although well-suited to small data, remain limited in their representational capacity. This review addresses this gap by surveying key drug discovery tasks, highlighting the prevalence of limited data, and synthesizing both traditional ML methods and advanced DL strategies tailored to these contexts. By integrating methodological advances with task-specific applications, the review outlines current approaches and identifies opportunities for advancing robust, interpretable, and generalizable AI in drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.