ArticleJournal of molecular biology2026
IHMValidation: Assessment of Integrative Structure Models Deposited to the Protein Data Bank.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PDB-IHM is a branch of the Protein Data Bank (PDB), a Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) Core Archive, that expands its scope by allowing for additional biomolecular structure representations and types of experimental information (i.e., integrative/hybrid structure models). As of October 2025, PDB-IHM contained 374 entries, benefitting from multi-scale and multi-state representations and 17 types of experimental data. These structure models are assigned PDB accession codes and are archived alongside other experimental structures in the PDB. Rigorous interpretation of a structure model requires assessment of underlying data quality, consistency with the input data, and estimates of positional uncertainty of its components. Herein, we present the IHMValidation pipeline (https://validate.pdb-ihm.org; https://github.com/salilab/IHMValidation) based on recommendations from the wwPDB Integrative Methods Task Force plus the small-angle scattering (SAS), chemical crosslinking mass spectrometry (crosslinking-MS), and cryo-electron microscopy and tomography (3DEM) communities. The IHMValidation report (available in both PDF and HTML formats) comprises six sections: (i) overview; (ii) model details; (iii) data quality assessments; (iv) local geometry assessments (i.e., model quality); (v) fit of the model to the data used to generate it; and (vi) fit of the model to the data used for validation. Future expansions of the IHMValidation pipeline will: (i) reflect recommendations coming from additional experimental communities, including Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and hydrogen/deuterium exchange MS (HDX-MS); (ii) include other validation criteria, such as Bayesian likelihoods for the data; and (iii) represent estimates of structure model uncertainty based on the variation among alternative models satisfying input data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.