ArticleCurrent biology : CB2026
Re-exposure to reward re-evaluates related memories.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To adapt behavior in changing environments, animals must continuously re-evaluate previously learned associations. This flexibility of memory systems has been identified as a promising strategy to target maladaptive memories. Here, we show that re-exposure to an unconditioned stimulus (US) alone, a sugar reward, can re-evaluate appetitive memories in Drosophila melanogaster. Using olfactory conditioning, we demonstrate that unpaired US exposure after memory formation reduces conditioned responses to multiple odor-reward associations. This reduction is specific to the re-exposure of the trained US and does not result from an altered motivational state or generalized behavioral suppression. Importantly, this US-induced memory devaluation engages mechanisms distinct from dopamine-driven modulation of memory accessibility, indicating a separate process of memory re-evaluation. Moreover, we find that sugar re-exposure diminishes both short- and long-term memory phases and can act on consolidated memories, suggesting broad temporal applicability. Notably, this devaluation does not change the reward-memory trace in specific mushroom body output neurons, implying that the underlying memory trace remains intact despite behavioral suppression. Our findings reveal a mechanism by which reward re-experience pervasively devalues associated memories, offering a potential approach to target multiple memories without requiring re-exposure to individual cues. This work provides insight into how experience can broadly reshape memory networks and may inform future approaches for persistent memory modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.