ArticleInternational journal of hygiene and environmental health2026
Psychosocial distress among individuals residing in a rural PFAS-contaminated community.
Article in International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PFAS Contamination and the Impacts of Environmental Turbulence: The Role of Collective Memory and Narrative Epidemiology in Invisible Disaster.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few studies have evaluated how awareness of PFAS contamination impacts psychosocial distress. We sought to quantify psychosocial distress associated with awareness of drinking water PFAS contamination in the Maine Biosolids Study (n=146), a rural cohort affected by agricultural biosolids spreading. Participants had residential well water PFAS concentrations measured by the Department of Environmental Protection and were notified about concentrations above or below the Maine Interim Drinking Water Standard [∑6 PFAS (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, PFHpA, PFDA) ≥20 ng/L]. We utilized negative binomial mixed effects regression to study associations of awareness of water PFAS above the Standard with PFAS-related psychosocial outcomes and state-dependent anxiety. We explored effect modification by pre-existing mental health diagnoses and resilience coping style. Fifty-eight percent of participants had drinking water PFAS above the Standard, and 35% had pre-existing mental health diagnoses. Affected participants with drinking water PFAS above the Standard had greater PFAS-related anxiety, worry and fears about health risk, and perceived stigma [for example, IRR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.