Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41421136›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025

New population-specific cephalic index standards for Malaysian subadults: prevalence, growth patterns, and clinical implications from a CT imaging study.

Sharifah Nabilah Syed Mohd Hamdan, Rabi'ah Al-Adawiyah Rahmat, Selva Malar Munusamy, Norliza Ibrahim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharifah Nabilah Syed Mohd HamdanDepartment of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address: sh.nabilah@um.edu.my.
Rabi'ah Al-Adawiyah RahmatDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Selva Malar MunusamyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Norliza IbrahimDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePopulation-specific Cephalic Index (CI) classifications are lacking for Malaysian subadults. This study aimed to develop a new CI classification and determine the prevalence of deformational brachycephaly using Computed Tomography (CT) images.

methodsA total of 520 CT images from subadults aged 0- to 20-years were included in the study. Two cranial measurements were obtained: the maximum Cephalic Length (CL) and the maximum Cephalic Width (CW), derived from axial CT images. The CI was subsequently calculated using the formula: CW/CL × 100. In addition, a simple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between CI and age.

resultsThe modified CI ranges for the Malaysian subadult population were defined as follows: dolichocephalic ≤ 78.8, mesocephalic 78.9-89.0, brachycephalic 89.1-94.0, and hyperbrachycephalic ≥ 94.1. The predictive equation derived was y = 87.08-0.47x +0.01×

conclusionThis new, population-specific classification provides an essential reference tool for clinicians and researchers to accurately detect, manage, and treat cranial deformities in Malaysian subadults, with significant applications in pediatrics, anthropology, and forensic medicine.

Indexed as

Cephalic indexComputed tomographyCranial deformityDeformational brachycephalyMalaysian subadults

Identifiers

PMID41421136
PMCPMC12794508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.