ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Beyond diagnosis: deep-learning-based analysis of hospitalization using abdominal radiographs in the emergency department.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAbdominal radiography (AXR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (ED) but has limited clinical utility. Thus, this study developed deep-learning models using AXR to predict hospitalization in ED patients with abdominal symptoms.
methodsThis retrospective study included 1,585 adult ED patients with abdominal symptoms who underwent AXR between August and December 2021. External validation included 112 patients. Three prediction models were developed using random forest classifiers: an image model, a clinical model, and a fusion model combining both image and clinical features. DenseNet201 extracted image features, and early clinical information obtainable by non-physician staff was incorporated. The performances of the two radiologists were compared with those of a deep-learning model.
resultsThe fusion model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.76), sensitivity of 0.82, and an F1-score of 0.75 in internal validation. Human readers showed high specificity (0.80-0.95) but low sensitivity (0.13-0.52) and F1-scores (0.23-0.55). Deep-learning models achieved substantially higher sensitivity and F1-scores than human readers, but with lower specificity (0.43), making them suitable for screening. In the external validation, the performance of the fusion model decreased (AUROC, 0.60), but image-based models maintained a higher sensitivity than human readers. Of all the radiographs, 11.1% showed abnormal findings, and 5.8% were specific to the final diagnosis.
conclusionDeep learning significantly improved the clinical utility of AXR in screening for hospitalization risk, achieving higher sensitivity and F1-scores than radiologists. While these models require further improvement for clinical implementation, they can potentially extract predictive patterns from traditionally limited imaging studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41420745What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.