ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2025
The Nature of Noise Modulates Readers' Inferences for Transposition Errors of Reversible Words in Chinese Sentences.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent evidence within the noisy-channel framework suggests that when encountering implausible sentences, rational readers can make inferences about the speaker's intentions. However, it remains unclear how the nature of noise and the degree of changes from a plausible sentence to its implausible alternative affect the reader's inferences. Using an explicit error-correction task, we manipulated the degree of changes in implausible sentences by transposing two characters within a Chinese reversible word, either maintaining or changing its syntactic category. The nature of noise was also manipulated between participants by having them read, along with experimental stimuli, exposure sentences that contained common mistakes, transposition errors, mixed errors, or no errors. Results showed that Chinese readers were able to infer that the implausible test sentences were corrupted by word transpositions, and that their inferences were modulated by the exposure condition, but not by the degree of changes. These findings are consistent with the Context-Specific Noise hypothesis, suggesting that Chinese readers make fine-grained inferences for implausible sentences, independent of the degree of changes between the implausible and plausible alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41420733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.