ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
A visual mining analysis of middle meningeal embolization and other factors associated with recurrence requiring re-operation in subdural hematomas: a single-center series.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeto comprehensively and hierarchically assess risk factors for recurrence requiring reoperation (RrR) in chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in the era of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE).
methodsPatients treated for a cSDH from January 2019 to October 2024 at Fondazione Gemelli research hospital were considered for inclusion. Clinical, coagulation, radiological, and treatment factors were recorded. MMAE was performed systematically from October 2022, using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles injected directly from the main trunk of MMA. The dataset comprised 45 quantitative and qualitative variables for each cSDH. Variables showing statistical significance (p-value < 0.05) were selected as covariates in two supervised learning frameworks to predict the RrR (outcome, Y): (i) Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and (ii) Random Forest (RF) classifier.
results500 patients were eligible and 233 were included, resulting in 283 treated cSDHs (mean follow-up: 119 days); 129 underwent adjuvant MMAE. 50 cSDH had a RrR (mean time to recurrence: 47 days), of which 41 (82%) in the non-embolized group and 9 (18%) in the embolized group (p-value < 0.001). Adjuvant embolization was the strongest factor associated with RrR, significantly reducing the risk for reintervention. Markwalder grading scale, preoperative cSDH volume, and platelet count (PLT) are strong predictors in non-embolized patients. A critical PLT cut-off of 229 × 10
conclusionsThe present results support the routine use of MMAE and the correction of PLT in relation to cSDH volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.