ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Distal radial access for complex percutaneous coronary interventions: current evidence and future perspectives.
Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05490238 (DIStal Versus COnventional Radial Access for COMPLEX Large-bore Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DIStal Versus COnventional Radial Access for COMPLEX Large-bore Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (DISCO COMPLEX)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal radial access (DRA) is a valid alternative to conventional transradial access (TRA) for coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Increasing experience and expertise with DRA have enabled its potential use in patients undergoing PCI for more complex coronary lesions, such as chronic total occlusions, left main coronary artery disease, heavily calcified lesions, and complex bifurcation lesions. However, randomized evidence on DRA is currently limited to diagnostic procedures and/or PCI of non-complex coronary lesions, typically using ≤ 6-French (Fr) arterial sheaths or guide catheters. Data regarding the feasibility and safety of DRA for complex PCI remains restricted to small, single-center studies and multicenter registries, which have included only a limited number of patients undergoing PCI with large-bore (≥ 7-Fr) guide catheters. Despite these limitations, existing data suggest that DRA is both feasible and safe for complex PCI. However, dedicated randomized trials are needed to further substantiate these findings. The DISCO COMPLEX (NCT05490238) randomized trial is currently investigating the superiority of DRA over conventional TRA in terms of radial artery occlusion rates in patients undergoing complex large-bore PCI with a 7-Fr introducer sheath. This article reviews the current evidence and explores future directions for DRA in complex coronary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.