Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420686›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026

Distal radial access for complex percutaneous coronary interventions: current evidence and future perspectives.

Juan F Iglesias, Adel Aminian, Gregor Leibundgut, Claudiu Ungureanu, Grigorios Tsigkas, Giuseppe Colletti, Maarten A H van Leeuwen, Ivo Bernat, Stefan Harb, Karsten Schenke and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05490238 (DIStal Versus COnventional Radial Access for COMPLEX Large-bore Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05490238 narecruitingnot on this map

DIStal Versus COnventional Radial Access for COMPLEX Large-bore Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (DISCO COMPLEX)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIGLESIAS Juan FernandoRan2023 to 2027Enrolled708ConditionsVascular Access Site OcclusionArmsComplex PCI with Ultimaster family drug-eluting stent (Terumo Corp., Japan)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Juan F IglesiasDepartment of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland. juanfernando.iglesias@hug.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-6036
Adel AminianDepartment of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
Gregor LeibundgutDepartment of Cardiology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Claudiu UngureanuDepartment of Cardiology, Jolimont Hospital, La Louvière, Belgium.
Grigorios TsigkasUniversity of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Giuseppe CollettiCardiovascular Department, Clinique Saint Joseph, Vivalia, Arlon, Belgium.
Maarten A H van LeeuwenDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Heart Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Ivo BernatDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, University Hospital, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Stefan HarbDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Karsten SchenkeDepartment of Cardiology, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ioannis SkalidisInstitut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France.
Arnaud PlanchatDepartment of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland.
Pierfrancesco AgostoniHartCentrum, Ziekenhuis Aan de Stroom (ZAS) Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium.
Gregory A SguegliaDivision of Cardiology, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distal radial access (DRA) is a valid alternative to conventional transradial access (TRA) for coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Increasing experience and expertise with DRA have enabled its potential use in patients undergoing PCI for more complex coronary lesions, such as chronic total occlusions, left main coronary artery disease, heavily calcified lesions, and complex bifurcation lesions. However, randomized evidence on DRA is currently limited to diagnostic procedures and/or PCI of non-complex coronary lesions, typically using ≤ 6-French (Fr) arterial sheaths or guide catheters. Data regarding the feasibility and safety of DRA for complex PCI remains restricted to small, single-center studies and multicenter registries, which have included only a limited number of patients undergoing PCI with large-bore (≥ 7-Fr) guide catheters. Despite these limitations, existing data suggest that DRA is both feasible and safe for complex PCI. However, dedicated randomized trials are needed to further substantiate these findings. The DISCO COMPLEX (NCT05490238) randomized trial is currently investigating the superiority of DRA over conventional TRA in terms of radial artery occlusion rates in patients undergoing complex large-bore PCI with a 7-Fr introducer sheath. This article reviews the current evidence and explores future directions for DRA in complex coronary interventions.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionRadial ArteryCoronary AngiographyHumansBifurcationsCalcified lesionsChronic total occlusionComplex percutaneous coronary interventionDistal radial accessLeft main

Identifiers

PMID41420686
PMCPMC13002766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.