ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2026
Avoiding Catastrophic Mutations Accurately Predicts Amino Acid to Codon Pairing.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA codon mutations involving Stop signals or the amino acid cysteine can be especially damaging. The former can break protein sequences or add extraneous amino acids. The latter can add or subtract disulfide bonds crucial in protein folding. We present a hypothetical scenario where Stop codons were present early in the evolution of the genetic code; and minimizing catastrophic mutations for code networks affected all subsequent amino acid/codon pairings. Predicted features of this "Catastrophic Mutation Minimization Hypothesis" (CMMH) are that: (1) Cysteine is mutationally adjacent to Stop, isolating a contiguous codon 'neighborhood' with high potential for catastrophe. (2) The sequence of amino acid additions order determines codon assignments through minimizing network-wide mutation costs. Overall, codon locations for 16 of the 20 amino acids in the genetic code are consistent with the CMMH, as are multiple other predictions. We propose an antecedent genetic code consisted of 16 doublet codons specifying 13-14 amino acids. Two variations of these networks are less susceptible to catastrophic mutations than 88.2-97.5% of randomly generated ones. Unlike some previous hypotheses, CMMH does not require the total replacement or rearrangement of amino acids at codons, with its disruptive potential for protein synthesis. Finally, the composition of this ancestral doublet genetic code has all the modern code's utility: amino acids from four chemical types; start and stop signals; metal-binding ability; disulfide bridging for creating protein shapes; and possible epigenetic gene regulation. Thus, the modern code likely evolutionarily fine-tuned antecedent capabilities, rather than significantly increasing competence for making complex proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.