ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Innovative AI model for bladder cancer diagnosis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBladder cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the urinary system, and early diagnosis and treatment are crucial for improving patient prognosis.
methodsIn this study, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for bladder cancer diagnosis using CT imaging data from our hospital and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The model was trained and validated using a large dataset of CT images, and its diagnostic accuracy was assessed through various performance metrics. The AI model was constructed using deep learning techniques, which can automatically learn and extract features from CT images. Retrospective CT data from our hospital and TCIA were used to train the AI model. Performance metrics were evaluated, and the Grad-CAM results were reviewed by radiologists.
resultsThe test-set accuracy exceeded 0.90, and Grad-CAM correctly highlighted tumors.
conclusionsThe AI model offers accurate and transparent bladder-cancer detection on routine CT scans and merits prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.