ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2025
Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Rhinosinusitis.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Concomitant Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Real-World Exploratory Study.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe aim to highlight recent advancements on the evolving chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) phenotype: acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS). We focused on studies that expanded the current understanding of its pathophysiology, patient characteristics, and disease burden. RECENT
findingsDefining AECRS has been a topic of discussion for many years. A recent regulatory definition of AECRS in the literature incorporates a > 3 day requirement of worsened symptoms and an escalation of treatment. It is important not to rely on patient-reported rescue medication frequency as it was recently demonstrated these are only obtained for 1/3 of reported AECRS episodes. The pathophysiology behind AECRS is still being evaluated but it appears irritants such as viral insult to the sinonasal microbiome can create a dysbiosis and worsens host immune system breakdown, facilitating a subsequent bacterial infection. Many studies are using loose definitions of AECRS because no formal definition has existed until recently. Clinical trials and other studies are relying on patient-reported illnesses, CRS-related antibiotics, and CRS-related corticosteroids to determine an episode of AECRS. Formally defining AECRS is vital in order to conduct future literature on its etiology and clinical outcomes so results may be translatable. Additionally, our review demonstrates that CRS patients with asthma and/or concomitant allergic rhinitis appear to be at an increased risk for developing AECRS and future research should continue to investigate their interplay. Many patients are being overprescribed antibiotics and corticosteroids for reported AECRS episodes. This increases total healthcare spending and increases the risk for adverse effects from corticosteroids and antibiotic resistance. Future research should investigate methods to mitigate this practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.