ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Impact of removal of the lateral orbital rim on intraorbital pressure during endoscopic trans-orbital approach (ETOA): a cadaveric study.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA) is being established as a new corridor for the lateral portion of the anterior and middle skull base. One of the main concerns is the risk of ophthalmological complications due to orbital retraction. Removal of the lateral orbital rim (LOR) is a simple measure that widens the corridor and may diminish injuries secondary to retraction. This study analyzes the impact of LOR removal on intraorbital pressure (IORP) during the stages of ETOA.
methodsIn this prospective cadaveric study, standard ETOA to the anterior and middle fossae were performed via a superior eyelid crease incision (Fig. 2). On one side, the LOR was preserved; on the other, it was removed. IORP was recorded with an intracranial pressure (ICP) probe during the entirety procedure (Fig. 3). All specimens underwent pre- and post-procedure CT to measure bone removal volume.
resultsFour specimens were used (8 sides, 4 with LOR removal, 4 without). Mean IORP was not statistically different between groups during periorbita detachment, which was prior to LOR removal (117.4 vs 91.5 mmHg, for the LOR removal group and LOR intact group respectively p = 0.217). IORP was consistently reduced in the LOR removal group in every subsequent step (Fig. 3): meningo-orbital band cutting (105.5 to 38.9 mmHg, p < 0.002), temporal fossa drilling (85.3 to 69.5 mmHg, p = 0.232), lateral greater sphenoid wing (GSW) drilling (99.8 to 49.9 mmHg, p < 0.001), medial GSW drilling (85.6 to 17.2 mmHg, p < 0.001), cavernous sinus peeling (85.6 to 3.0 mmHg, p < 0.001). LOR removal increased total bone removal volume from 6.2 cc to 9.4 cc (p = 0.05).
conclusionLOR removal decreased IORP, especially when working on the GSW and cavernous sinus, and significantly increased bone removal. These results support LOR removal to reduce orbital retraction stress and widen the working corridor during ETOA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.