ArticleOecologia2025
In poor taste: leaf palatability traits are not correlated with aboveground enemy release.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leaf Damage is Not the Answer! Reduced Herbivore Pressure Does Not Underpin Either Downhill or Uphill Range Shifts.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many species experience less pressure from herbivores, predators, or pathogens in their introduced range than in their native range. This phenomenon, known as enemy release, is one explanation for the success of introduced plant species worldwide. However, species experience enemy release to different extents, or not at all. Surprisingly, we have little understanding of what types of species or circumstances are associated with strong enemy release. We aimed to test whether ten defensive leaf traits that contribute to plants' palatability to aboveground herbivores can predict the level of enemy release they experience. Our study expands upon previous work, which found enemy release occurring across 16 plant species studied at 12 sites within their native (5 sites; European) and introduced (7 sites; Australian) ranges. Contrary to all predictions, we found no evidence that enemy release was related to ash content, C:N ratio, hair density, leaf dry matter content, leaf mass per area, cyanogen presence, lipid content, phenolic compounds, oxidative activity, or combined chemical, physical, and total defences. This result demonstrates the need to further assess other traits, or environmental variables that may contribute to enemy release, so that we may more accurately predict when and where it is most likely to occur. Finding that these defensive traits do not predict enemy release in our study system brings us a step closer to understanding the mechanisms underlying successful invasion, which is increasingly important in our rapidly changing world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41420655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.