ArticleThe Veterinary record2026
Experiences of clinical supervisors while supporting student veterinary nurses in the clinical learning environment.
Article in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical supervisors are responsible for student veterinary nurse training in veterinary practices. Clinical supervisors can have a significant impact on student experiences, so understanding how the role is perceived by all stakeholders is vital for the future development of veterinary nurse training.
methodsA qualitative, cross-sectional design, using focus groups, was used to explore the perceptions of 16 clinical supervisors. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes across the focus group discussions. Situated learning theory was used to frame the study.
resultsClinical supervisors were motivated to provide a supportive learning experience for students and cited positive elements to this including supporting their own professional development. Challenges to supporting students included increasing student pastoral needs and a lack of protected time in practice. LIMITATIONS: The convenience recruitment strategy for this study may have led to volunteer (non-response) bias, which could have reduced the trustworthiness of the findings.
conclusionRobust support processes are important in training practices (TPs) and accredited education institutes (AEIs) to facilitate psychologically safe clinical environments, which support learning. It is beneficial if all members of the TP are involved in agreements with the AEI around the expectations of training students to ensure that time for training is appropriately managed and training expectations are clear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.