Trial reportClinical and translational science2025
Evaluating miRNA Sequencing and Integrative Proteomics for Identifying Plasma miRNAs as Potential Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers of IFNβ-1a Biologics.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating miRNA Sequencing and Integrative Proteomics for Identifying Plasma miRNAs as Potential Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers of IFNβ-1a Biologics.Clinical and translational science · 2025Trial
- Advances in New Approach Methodologies at FDA's Division of Applied Regulatory Science.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We used miRNA sequencing to identify candidate plasma pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers of interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) biologics and explored miRNA-mRNA targeted protein relationships and networks to support identified miRNA candidates. Plasma samples from 36 healthy subjects from a placebo-controlled randomized single-dose clinical study with IFNβ-1a and pegIFNβ-1a were used. Mature miRNAs were measured using an in-house miRNA-seq workflow at baseline, at 9 timepoints over 6 days in the IFNβ-1a group (n = 11 [30 μg]), and at 11 timepoints over 13 days in the pegIFNβ-1a group (n = 11 [125 μg]) and placebo-specific groups (n = 6 each). A miRNA was only considered expressed if it had a read count ≥ 10 in more than 50% of the samples across all treatment groups. Linear mixed-effects models (lmer) regressing miRNA changes with treatment, time, and their interaction were used to identify differentially expressed miRNAs, which were further prioritized based on the magnitude of response and biological relevance using in silico predicted miRNA-protein targets and regulatory network analyses. Ten and 13 miRNAs were impacted by IFNβ-1a and pegIFNβ-1a, respectively (lmer FDR-corrected p value < 0.1), compared to placebo, of which miR-223-3p and miR-21-5p were prioritized as candidate PD biomarkers for both products. Systems-level analysis of integrated proteomics data highlighted miRNAs' protein targets for both miR-223-3p and miR-21-5p that were linked to previously reported top proteomic response proteins and predicted regulatory networks including the IFN beta node. Using miRNA sequencing and linking candidates to predicted target proteins and regulatory networks, results suggest miR-223-3p and miR-21-5p as potential PD biomarkers of IFNβ-1a biologics for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.