Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420552›Full record

ArticleJournal of morphology2025

Microanatomy of Dermal Roofing Bones in the Skull of Pipoid Frogs.

Tomás Fornari, Johannes Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of morphology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomás FornariMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9102-0494
Johannes MüllerMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research on bone microanatomy in amphibians suggests a correlation of microanatomical traits with both environmental and phylogenetic factors, but so far, studies had been limited to long bones. Using Pipoidea, a uniquely adapted clade of fully aquatic anurans, we investigated whether the microanatomical structures of anuran cranial bones display not only an ecological but also a clade-specific signal. Micro-CT scans of the skulls of five extant and three extinct pipoids species were compared with those of four phylogenetically distant, yet similarly aquatic anurans. We focused on the frontoparietal and maxillary bones, because they are among the largest bones in the anuran skull and are often preserved as fossils. From each of the bones the overall compactness, cross-sectional area, and thickness were extracted. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between the three groups in thickness and cross-sectional area, which is consistent with their shared lifestyle. Compactness, however, revealed a statistically significant difference between the Pipoidea clade and the phylogenetically distant group. Our findings suggest the presence of both a clade-specific and an environmental signal in the bone compactness of the pipoidean skull.

Indexed as

AnuraSkullAnimalsFossilsPhylogenyX-Ray MicrotomographyfrontoparietalmaxillamicroanatomyPipoidea

Identifiers

PMID41420552
PMCPMC12717838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.