ArticleResearch in nursing & health2026
Navigating Integration in Mixed-Methods: A Practical Guide for Novice Nursing Researchers.
Article in Research in nursing & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trainees' experience and expectations of cerebrocardiac health advisors training programs in China: a mixed-method study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mixed-methods research is increasingly used in healthcare to understand complex issues, yet integration of qualitative and quantitative findings remains challenging, particularly for novice researchers. This paper provides a practical guide for nursing researchers to integrate survey and interview data effectively. Using a sequential explanatory design exemplar with an embedded quasi-experimental component, we demonstrate key integration strategies, including joint displays and narrative weaving. The paper emphasizes that robust integration must be planned from the outset, with clear goals specifying how data types will address research questions. We illustrate how purposeful integration points, carefully constructed joint displays, and narrative synthesis of meta-inferences can generate deeper insights than either method alone. By providing concrete examples and step-by-step guidance, this resource equips novice researchers with essential skills for achieving rigorous, cohesive integration in mixed-methods studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.