Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420368›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Attending to Gyn-Ecology: Managing the 'Mess' of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Thrush.

Tori Ford, Sue Ziebland, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Gail Hayward, Abigail McNiven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tori FordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1967-6364
Sue ZieblandNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah Tonkin-CrineNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gail HaywardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abigail McNivenNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR302322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous social science research on gendered experiences of thrush and vulvovaginal health has overlooked, or inadvertently sanitised, the materiality of having a body. Therefore, this study aims to return attention to the material, sensorial, and corporeal dimensions of living with recurrent thrush and use this to broaden our understandings of gendered embodiment. We present findings from a qualitative study of interviews with 32 people including women, trans, nonbinary and gender diverse people. This paper examines the bodily experiences of recurrent vulvovaginal thrush through a feminist materiality lens, drawing on concepts of 'leaky bodies' and microbiological relationships with the 'not-me'/'not-not-me'. We present the multidimensional experiences of managing recurrent vulvovaginal thrush, examining the 'mess' it creates, the vigilance required to monitor microbial imbalances, the negotiation of gendered perceptions of 'grossness' and the compromises individuals make between physical and emotional dis/comfort. Through attending to the material, microbial, and gendered imaginaries and realities involved in managing the 'mess' of recurrent thrush, we explore the additional considerations and challenges experienced by those with lived experience currently missing from research.

Indexed as

Candidiasis, VulvovaginalAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID41420368
PMCPMC12717482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.